Skip to Content

Offsite blog roll

Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
We have a little over 400 posts up on the blog since we started with “Welcome Entrepreneurs” on October 1, 2006. I thought I would offer some guidance to newer readers on which have been the most popular. I have looked at popularity through three lenses: feed click throughs, unique page views, and total page views. Based on feed click throughs (in theory selected by regular readers, perhaps influenced by the title): Nov-26-2007: Planning Will Save a Software Startup Money Aug-25-2008: Three Tests for Negotiating a Software Deal Sep-10-2008: Good Blogging is Good Linking Based on Unique Page Views (in theory the most popular among all readers) Dec-4-2008 We Don’t Encourage Individuals to Form a Startup May-28-2008 Bloggers Covering Electronic Design Automation Oct-4-2007 Benefits of SaaS Model And one more based on total Page Views (some folks must have read this more than once). Oct-23-2007: Dharmesh Shah’s Pithy Thoughts for Startup Co-Founders ...
Blogging, skmurphy
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
One of the things I like to do is re-work and improve comments I have left in forums or on other blogs into posts on this blog. I have been using Backtype for a few weeks now and have found it useful for keeping track of other places I have commented. You need to register and claim comments under various aliases that comment systems require you to use (e.g. my skmurphy e-mail, my Gmail account, Hacker News ID, etc..). For a list of my recovered comments see http://www.backtype.com/skmurphy ...
Blogging, skmurphy
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
I attended a great Douglas Partner’s workshop this week. I have always been a believer in the power of a good Linkedin profile.  Our experience is that your website and your LinkedIn profile will be used for reference checks by people you meet. I use LinkedIn as a combination on-line bio and self-updating Rolodex. In Silicon Valley I think that your LinkedIn profile is as important as your website to make the right impression on potential clients, partners, and future team members. A great LinkedIn profile can increase your visibility. The workshop was chock full of tips: in addition to good feedback from not only the instructors but other attendees, I appreciated the time to work on my profile. Here are three improvements I made:: I changed my “headline” from my current title (default) to a catchy tag line: “Customer Development for Software Startups Focusing on Early Customer and Early Revenue” With input from other attendees, I strengthened my experience section. I really liked MB Dean’s Problem, Action, Result format and am working on using it throughout my experience summary. I came up with the following three sentence overview: “I offer business development services for software entrepreneurs. I give practical advice that cuts through the bull to help you build a business. I am a hardware engineer and a mom, so I like action lists with a do-it/done methodology.” I added the SKMurphy blog to my profile. The workshop is aimed at people looking for a job, but it applies to entrepreneurs looking for consulting work and customers. It is a great hands-on workshop. Check the event schedule on Douglas Partners website to see where others are scheduled. ...
Events, tshafer
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
Bootstrappers Breakfast(TM) announces Pete Tormey “the Patent Guy” (http://www.actionpatents.com) as invited guest to discuss when you need a patent and tips for getting one. Patents provide an important competitive advantage, and young companies need to develop an understanding of patents to maintain this competitive advantage.Bootstrappers Breakfast will meet at Omega Restaurant in Milpitas, Feb. 13, 2009 at 7:30-9am. Mr. Tormey will give a short 5-10 introduction to set the table for a roundtable discussion on protecting inventions. Bootstrappers Breakfast brings together leading entrepreneurs who eat problems for breakfast and are serious about growing their business. “Pete Tormey is a registered patent agent who specializes in providing patents for Software, Electronics, Life Science Instrumentation and Business Methods. Action Patents is a great website with a lot of practical advice. He has a number of excellent podcasts — take a listen to Patent Basics for a great example — where he speaks in very clear and practical language about patent related legal and invention issues,” said Sean Murphy, CEO of SKMurphy. About Action Patents Action Patents provides fast affordable patent protection to young companies and entrepreneurs. As an experienced entrepreneur, Mr. Tormey is rare among patent agents and attorneys because he provides solid financial analysis on the value of patents before recommending patent protection. Mr. Tormey has an MBA in Marketing from St. Mary’s College in California, and a BS Electronic Engineering from San Francisco State University. He practices exclusively before the US Patent Office. About Bootstrappers Breakfasts Bootstrappers Breakfasts are for founders of early-stage startups. It is a chance to compare notes on operational, development, and business issues with peers. These breakfasts were designed for entrepreneurs to share ideas and leverage thoughts with other folks who are serious about growing their business. With a promise of serious conversations with other entrepreneurs who eat problems for breakfast, they meet in the back room at several Silicon Valley restaurants. The first breakfast was held at Coco’s in the heart of Silicon Valley in 2005. Since that time, they have grown to multiple locations throughout the Bay Area. The newest one is now at Red Rock Coffee in Mountain View. For the full schedule of breakfasts, please visit http://www.bootstrappersbreakfast.com ...
Events, tshafer
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
I took part in the Marketing Consultant’s forum at CNSV tonight as a panelist, joining Ahmet Alpdemir, Brian Berg, and Peter Salmon. The slides are on the CNSV site at www.californiaconsultants.org/download.cfm/attachment/CNSV-0901-Berg-Mur... My focus was on “Cultivating Communities to Get More Customers.” I addressed joining a community with the objective of becoming a member in good standing. Broadly there are two kinds of communities for a consultant: prospects and peers (who are both potential partners and competitors). In either case you want to learn and follow  unwritten rules and local customs, finding ways to contribute to the core purpose of the community. In a peer community you want to think about joining and fostering a “stag hunt.” Here is a non-technical definition from the Game Theory Dictionary The French philosopher, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presented the following situation. Two hunters can either jointly hunt a stag (an adult deer and rather large meal) or individually hunt a rabbit (tasty, but substantially less filling). Hunting stags is quite challenging and requires mutual cooperation. If either hunts a stag alone, the chance of success is minimal. Hunting stags is most beneficial for society but requires a lot of trust among its members. What this means as a practical matter is that you are looking for other consultants who will be reliable and have complementary expertise. This will allow you to take on larger projects. You may also carry other consultant’s business cards so that you can refer work to them that’s appropriate if it’s not a match with your skills and expertise. In a community that’s primarily prospects, you have to create more value than you harvest or you will be viewed as a parasite instead of a contributor. The challenge is to err on the side of caution in marketing your services. A side benefit, if you listen carefully, is to learn about emerging topics and issues before they become common knowledge. It was a very well attended meeting. Brian Berg noted the organization has doubled in size in the last year and the downturn/recession has seen a lot of first time consultants join. There were a number of questions from folks who were considering consulting (or possibly anticipating an involuntary career change to consultant) as well as those who were new to consulting in the last year or so. The challenge with learning how to market yourself as a consultant is that it’s typically a mid-career change that your earlier work as an engineer doesn’t prepare you well for. The technical challenges of consulting are for the most part straightforward compared to the new challenges in marketing oneself in a way that is authentic and effective. I think all of us on the panel were sensitive to those issues. I would also encourage newer technical consultants to attend the CNSV marketing meetings that occur before the main meeting. Very experienced consultants like Carl Angotti and Walt Maclay donate their time to share a number of effective techniques for marketing a technical practice. They include a how to section where attendees can critique each other’s work (e.g. Craigslist profiles) and walk you through the process of posting on-line in appropriate forums. Update Jan-24: I see that Mike Coop has also blogged about the meeting in “Recap: IEEE CNSV Meeting.“ ...
skmurphy
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
After thinking some more about yesterday’s post on entrepreneurial motivation I thought I would re-read some Peter Drucker, his clarity and prescience continue to impress me. All of these quotes are from Chapter 6 “What is a Business” in “Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, and Practices” There is only one definition of business purpose: to create a customer. It is the customer who determines what a business is. It is the customer alone whose willingness to pay for a good or for a service converts economic resources into wealth, things into goods. The typical engineering definition of quality is something that is hard to do, is complicated, and costs a lot But of money!that isn’t quality; it’s incompetence. What the customer thinks he is buying, what he considers value, is decisive–it determines what a business is, what it produces, and whether it will prosper. And what the customer buys and considers value is never a product. It is always utility, that is, what a product or service does for him. Profit is not the explanation, cause, or rationale of business behavior and business decisions, but rather the test of their validity. If archangels instead of businessmen sat in directors’ chairs, they would still have to be concerned with profitability, despite their total lack of personal interest in making profits. A company can make a social contribution only if it is highly profitable. Managers must convert society’s needs into opportunities for profitable business. That, too, is a definition of innovation. ...
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
Tim O’Reilly had a thought provoking post “Work on Stuff that Matters” on January 11. He starts with a clarification of what he means by “the social value of business done right” First off, though, I want to make clear that “work on stuff that matters” does not mean focusing on non-profit work, “causes, or any other form of “do-goodism.” Non-profit projects often do matter a great deal, and people with tech skills can make important contributions, but it’s essential to get beyond that narrow box. I’m a strong believer in the social value of business done right. We need to build an economy in which the important things are paid for in self-sustaining ways rather than as charities to be funded out of the goodness of our hearts. and then offers three guidelines 1. Work on Something That Matters to You More Than Money. [T]he entrepreneurs who first made the market often had much less expectation of easy success, and were instead wrestling, like Jacob with the angel, with a hard problem that they thought they could solve, or at the very least make a dent on. […] The most successful companies treat success as a byproduct of achieving their real goal, which is always something bigger and more important than they are. By picking the right mission you also enable others to collaborate more effectively with you. Michael Schrage, who has studied collaboration in a variety of settings, has said that one clear rule of thumb has emerged. If you want talented people to collaborate, you have to pick a problem that they care about, and it is so hard that they realize they need to work together to make meaningful progress (for more on this see Shared Minds, No More Teams, or Serious Play) 2. Create More Value Than You Capture. [M]ost businesses do in fact create value for their community and their customers as well as themselves, and the most successful businesses do so in part by creating a self-reinforcing value loop with their customers.[…] How many people do you employ in fulfilling jobs? How many customers use your products to make their own living? I think this good advice but very challenging to master. It’s easy to be clear on your own needs, harder to see how to co-evolve with a system of suppliers, partners, and customers in a community. Peter Drucker called “the worship of premium pricing” as first deadly sin of business: “The worship of premium pricing always creates a market for the competitor. And high profit margins do not equal maximum profits. Total profit is profit margin multiplied by turnover.  Maximum profit is thus obtained by the profit margin that yields the largest total profit flow, and that is usually the profit margin that produces optimum market standing.” 3. Take the Long View It’s hard to see beyond the “small here” and the “short now,” especially if you live in a favored place and time. Peter Drucker has observed that the second deadly sin of business is “mispricing a new product by charging ‘what the market will bear.’ This, too, creates risk-free opportunity for the competition.” Beyond any entrepreneur’s concerns for successfully establishing their company in a market are the obligations that we all have to our family and our community. On January 13, Po Bronson’s “What Should I Do With My Life, Now?” was posted on the Fast Company website. He offers a perspective that acknowledges the need to work on stuff that matters but also admits of more practical motivations. He tells a version of the story of the three brick layers (I first heard it as three stone masons) with a different emphasis. There’s an old parable about the three bricklayers. They’re laying bricks all morning, and when they finally get a break, one guy asks the other two, “Why are you doing this job?” The first guy says, “I’m doing it for the wages.” The second guy says, “I’m doing it for my wife and kids.” The third guy looks up at what they’ve been constructing all morning, which is a church — a place to get in touch with one’s highest self — and says, “I’m helping to build a cathedral.” Now, most people hear this parable, and they think the third guy has the right answer, and the first two guys have the wrong answer. That’s the simplistic lesson that most people jump to, led their by their mythic notions of calling. But that is not the lesson of the parable. In fact, all three men have a sense of purpose — have a “cathedral,” if you will. The third guy has the Cathedral of Spirituality. Good for him. But the second guy has his too. The Cathedral of Family. And the third guy has the Cathedral of Self-sufficiency. Those are all good purposes. Those are all right answers. The real lesson of the parable is, notice what no man answered. Not one of the three said, “I just love laying bricks.” Doing something for the sheer love of it is not what real people mean when they say their work provides a sense of purpose. That is not how the construct a sense of meaning and rightness. Looking for it, in that form, is incredibly illusory. I think many entrepreneurs are motivated as much by self-sufficiency, either at a personal or family level, as a higher calling. I think you elevate your goals, similar to Maslow’s “Hierarchy of Needs,” as more basic motivations are satisfied. Bronson seems to be rejecting Joseph Campbell’s “follow your bliss” but I think what he is really saying is that  pure doing is not enough–whether it’s writing code, writing books, sculpting, painting, etc.. I have to balance my obligations to myself, my family, and my community. This is at the heart of Tim O’Reilly’s three rules as well. “If you do not have the capacity for happiness with a little money, great wealth will not bring it to you.” William Feather “Life is too short to work at a job you hate, but everyone has to do something someone else is willing to pay them for.” Sid Emmert ...
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
I attended CSPA’s “Looking Down the Money Trail” tonight at Pilsbury in Palo Alto. Pilsbury hosts a number of entrepreneur oriented events and tonight their room was overflowing. One reason was that the event had a stellar panel: Steve Bengston, Managing Director of Emerging Company Services (ECS), PricewaterhouseCoopers Prashant Shah, Managing Director, Hummer Winblad Venture Partners Ashmeet Sidana, General Partner, Foundation Capital John Steuart, Managing Director, Claremont Creek Ventures Gus Tai, General Partner, Trinity Ventures Steve Bengston led off with are recap of the Q3/2008 PWC Moneytree results, so this was a retrospective in terms of the data that was presented.  The top six most active firms (by deal count) in Q3 were Draper Fisher Jurvetson 26, Intel Capital 20, New Enterprise Associates 19, Kleiner Perkins 18, Sequoia 17, and U.S. Venture Partners 17. Silicon Valley investments totaled 2.77 billion dollars in Q3, down about 3% from Q3/07’s 2.88 billion and about 10% from Q2/08’s 3.11 billion. Silicon Valley accounted for about 40% of the total US VC investment across all three time periods. Key comments from the panel caught my attention (all are paraphrased from my notes): John Steuart: healthcare consumes a significant and growing fraction of US GDP, we Claremont believe that enormous opportunities exist to build multiple large firms bringing Moore’s Law to medicine. Ashmeet Sudra, in reponse to a question about the role of government helping innovation and entrepreneurship: California’s ban on non-competes (except in the case of the sale of a business) has done more to take the shackles off of entrepreneurs than any other government action. Prashant Shah, in reponse to role of government question: government can make the long term investment in basic research that VC’s cannot. Basic research is the foundation for new technology entrepreneurship. Gus Tai (very paraphrased):  I am interested in software & SaaS offerings that can be distributed at no charge or low cost to individuals but once it reaches a critical mass of five users in the enterprise can be priced at value. He cited Zone Labs as an example: they offered a free personal firewall that enterprises had to pay for, when they discovered five at the same IP address they contacted them and asked them to convert from free to paid. Some consensus answers (echoed by more than one panel member). No B rounds right now (either they are re-priced / down rounds as a second A or there is clearly enough traction so that it can be priced as a C round). The credit crisis has caused some Limited Partners to pull back or withdraw from some commitments, making it much harder to close new funds and forcing some existing funds to re-open or add annexes. What’s hot? Anything with a “hard ROI” (clear cost savings attached) or attacking an existing cost stream that has  paying customers. K12 education is another area that government plays a critical role in laying the foundation for innovation and entrepreneurship. The first 25-50 million in revenue can proceed from a very narrow observation of what can drive revenue in a niche. Domain expertise and intimacy with a problem make all of the difference early on, later you need experience building a large company. There are two points in the Gartner hype cycle when that narrow observation has the most value (because of the highest risk of being wrong) before the technology trigger brings the market into existence and in the “trough of disillusionment when no one is sure when the real market will materialize. Note: Gartner Hype Cycle image by Jeremy Kemp, used under Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike License  ...
Events, skmurphy
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
One of the things that we always review with founders is their LinkedIn profile. It’s important for a several reasons: Prospects will check it either before they contact you or as they are doing more background checking on your company. The testimonials that are posted there have authenticated authorship and should also be posted on your website. It’s a convenient mechanism for reconnecting with old co-workers and other folks you have had prior shared success with. MB Deans is offering a good three part workshop on this Thursday January 15 at the Courtyard Marriott in Los Altos (4320 El Camino Real, Los Altos, CA 94022) for job seekers that will also be useful for bootstrappers: LinkedIn and Beyond: Building Your Job Hunt Strategy with LinkedIn and Facebook Blockbuster Profiles: Write One That Will Have Recruiters Calling You I’m on LinkedIn: Now What? Get the Next Steps to Success If that time or location is not convenient she is offering three more later this month: Emeryville, CA: January 20, 2009 Fremont, CA: January 22, 2009 San Francisco, CA: January 29, 2009 ...
Events, skmurphy
Posted on  by  from the site SKMurphy
I attended a workshop put on by CPSquare in 2003 on Communities of Practice that had a profound impact on my worldview. I met folks from around the US who helped to foster communities of practice in corporate, education, government, and non-profit settings and was surprised at how common the both the challenges and methodologies for overcoming them were. I had a chance to spend a day with Doug Engelbart, we ended up sitting at the same table and did a number of small group activities together. His concept of bootstrapping as an improvement of an improvement activity was an inspiration for our Bootstrapper Breakfasts, an effort to harness the collective IQ of a group of enterpreneurs who are each trying to get better to assist one another in getting better faster. Doug also demonstrated a version of his Open Hyperdocument System that has given me a model to aim for as we continue to improve the infrastructure for the delivery of our services: individual consulting, workshops, partner coordination, and collaboration as a part of the startup team to reach a working consensus on both strategy and the supporting materials to execute them. I decided to take part in CPSquare workshop that just started yesterday, and I would encourage anyone who is interested in learning more about wikis and other modes of on-line and face to face collaboration to consider joining. It’s going to run for the next few weeks, blending conference calls with on-line forum interaction and a number of very interesting case studies. I have been asked to present some cases on how we leverage a number of on-line tools, wikis in particular, but I am only one of many folks detailing their practice. We had a very good conference call to kick things off yesterday and I thought I would blog and encourage entrepreneurs who want to get better at combining a number of different modes of collaboration, both on-line and face to face, to sign up. It’s that good. The calls are taped and you will have access to the on-line examples so you haven’t missed very much at all if you sign up now.  You can register here: http://cpsquare.org/conferences/ The benefits: if you don’t learn how to be more effective in on-line collaboration, including techniques for global teams, and how to blend on-line and face to face collaboration to improve the quality of team meetings and decisions, then you are not paying attention. Our clients, while they are still primarily Silicon Valley firms, now include teams in Denmark, China, Australia, Sweden, India, and England. And watching how this international group has coordinated on this workshop has given me a number of new tools and techniques to improve how we work at a distance. It’s not my workshop so I am not bragging about anything you will learn from me, but it’s a diverse and creative group of folks who are pushing the state of the art in collaboration. It includes Ward Cunningham who invented wikis and Etienne Wenger who helped to formalize the concept of a community of practice, a well as many other less famous but equally insightful folks. SaaS, wikis, blogs are all more than a decade old: I think the next ten years may be as much about enhancing our understanding of how to leverage what’s already been invented as it is to invent new things. This will offer you an opportunity to start thinking hard about what that might entail in the way that you organize your work and your team. ...